usctrojancpa
Well-known member
I did when I read it....EEEKKKKiacrenter said:lcms2002 said:I figure I spend more time inside my house rather than on my driveway!
IHO would cringe at your comment
I did when I read it....EEEKKKKiacrenter said:lcms2002 said:I figure I spend more time inside my house rather than on my driveway!
IHO would cringe at your comment
lcms2002 said:Everyone would prefer a newer and detached house, but when it comes down to finance, we have to choose between a newer attached home and an older detached house. In Irvine, the older house in this range must be around 30-40 years old. If you are handy and enjoy home improvement, you may get the older one. For me, it is just a lot easier to buy a new home in a new neighborhood, new schools and new parks. We enjoy the house the day we move in, one of my friends had to tangle plumbing issue in the first month they moved in. The driveway is nice, but I would prefer the newer floor plan, it is much nicer. I figure I spend more time inside my house rather than on my driveway!
USCTrojanCPA said:Irvine not be the best city to make an investment in residential housing but if I had to pick I'd look at old Northwood, West Irvine, Woodbridge, and Oak Creek. I think that Portola Springs might have the best chance of future appreciation as gets fully built out. I would focus on looking at detached condos or homes. If a property is maintained well and it checks out when you get a home inspection, I wouldn't be too concerned about how old it is. As for timing, I think there are currently more downside pricing pressure than upside due to the headwinds that we are facing. Can property values in Irvine fall by 5-15%? It's possible...will it happen? I have no idea.
Better options would be Costa Mesa, parts of Tustin, Aliso Viejo, RSM, Anaheim Hills, parts of Orange, Laguna Niguel, and Yorba Linda to name a few. Those cities have home prices that are closer to rental parity than homes in Irvine.thelinux said:USCTrojanCPA said:Irvine not be the best city to make an investment in residential housing but if I had to pick I'd look at old Northwood, West Irvine, Woodbridge, and Oak Creek. I think that Portola Springs might have the best chance of future appreciation as gets fully built out. I would focus on looking at detached condos or homes. If a property is maintained well and it checks out when you get a home inspection, I wouldn't be too concerned about how old it is. As for timing, I think there are currently more downside pricing pressure than upside due to the headwinds that we are facing. Can property values in Irvine fall by 5-15%? It's possible...will it happen? I have no idea.
So which city is the good place for investment?
Where can I find a detached, not too old, no MRs and low HOA homes at between 400K and 500K (or between 500K and 600K)?
Why do you think PS could show best appreciation?
Thanks.
test said:shokunin said:.... It's like money down the drain every month ....
I'd rather sock away some of that $$$ .... with a lower single HOA ..... and put that into a house maintenance account. When maintenance needs arise, you would tap into that fund.
That is what is supposed to happen.
But have you looked at a sampling of HOA reserve funds lately? Many are depleted due to non-paying occupants.
That's exactly what the HOA does, and they can get things done far cheaper due to volume. A significant portion of your HOA fee goes into the reserve fund.
To each their own.iacrenter said:lcms2002 said:I figure I spend more time inside my house rather than on my driveway!
IHO would cringe at your comment
USCTrojanCPA said:Better options would be Costa Mesa, parts of Tustin, Aliso Viejo, RSM, Anaheim Hills, parts of Orange, Laguna Niguel, and Yorba Linda to name a few. Those cities have home prices that are closer to rental parity than homes in Irvine.thelinux said:USCTrojanCPA said:Irvine not be the best city to make an investment in residential housing but if I had to pick I'd look at old Northwood, West Irvine, Woodbridge, and Oak Creek. I think that Portola Springs might have the best chance of future appreciation as gets fully built out. I would focus on looking at detached condos or homes. If a property is maintained well and it checks out when you get a home inspection, I wouldn't be too concerned about how old it is. As for timing, I think there are currently more downside pricing pressure than upside due to the headwinds that we are facing. Can property values in Irvine fall by 5-15%? It's possible...will it happen? I have no idea.
So which city is the good place for investment?
Where can I find a detached, not too old, no MRs and low HOA homes at between 400K and 500K (or between 500K and 600K)?
Why do you think PS could show best appreciation?
Thanks.
IndieDev said:Aliso Viejo is getting extremely close to parity for pretty good homes. I still wouldn't go all in, if I were an investor, but I would keep an eye out in the next year or so.
thelinux said:IndieDev said:Aliso Viejo is getting extremely close to parity for pretty good homes. I still wouldn't go all in, if I were an investor, but I would keep an eye out in the next year or so.
What do you mean by "close to parity"? Sorry that I am so ignorant with this subject...
IndieDev said:thelinux said:IndieDev said:Aliso Viejo is getting extremely close to parity for pretty good homes. I still wouldn't go all in, if I were an investor, but I would keep an eye out in the next year or so.
What do you mean by "close to parity"? Sorry that I am so ignorant with this subject...
Rental parity.
Say I want to rent a 3 bedroom house in Aliso Viejo, and it cost me $2,200 a month. If I can purchase a home of equivalent location, dimensions and quality for the same monthly cost, you say that the monthly outlay of the home is at rental parity.
There are many complex heuristics out there that calculate monthly cost including appreciation, inflation, depreciation, tax implications, etc, but that's the basic idea.
Many investors, or even potential home buyers look at rental parity as an indicator of whether it's a good time to purchase a home because unlike "mortgage payments", market rental rates are primarily determined by three inputs; supply, demand, and the median salary in the area. You can't take out a stinky, festering, sub prime loan to rent an apartment.
akula1488 said:IndieDev said:thelinux said:IndieDev said:Aliso Viejo is getting extremely close to parity for pretty good homes. I still wouldn't go all in, if I were an investor, but I would keep an eye out in the next year or so.
What do you mean by "close to parity"? Sorry that I am so ignorant with this subject...
Rental parity.
Say I want to rent a 3 bedroom house in Aliso Viejo, and it cost me $2,200 a month. If I can purchase a home of equivalent location, dimensions and quality for the same monthly cost, you say that the monthly outlay of the home is at rental parity.
There are many complex heuristics out there that calculate monthly cost including appreciation, inflation, depreciation, tax implications, etc, but that's the basic idea.
Many investors, or even potential home buyers look at rental parity as an indicator of whether it's a good time to purchase a home because unlike "mortgage payments", market rental rates are primarily determined by three inputs; supply, demand, and the median salary in the area. You can't take out a stinky, festering, sub prime loan to rent an apartment.
Is it true renting should cost more than owning? otherwise being a landlord is not a very smart investment
IndieDev said:Rental parity.
Say I want to rent a 3 bedroom house in Aliso Viejo, and it cost me $2,200 a month. If I can purchase a home of equivalent location, dimensions and quality for the same monthly cost, you say that the monthly outlay of the home is at rental parity.
There are many complex heuristics out there that calculate monthly cost including appreciation, inflation, depreciation, tax implications, etc, but that's the basic idea.
Many investors, or even potential home buyers look at rental parity as an indicator of whether it's a good time to purchase a home because unlike "mortgage payments", market rental rates are primarily determined by three inputs; supply, demand, and the median salary in the area. You can't take out a stinky, festering, sub prime loan to rent an apartment.
Is rental parity usually calculated assuming a 20% down payment?IndieDev said:Rental parity.
Say I want to rent a 3 bedroom house in Aliso Viejo, and it cost me $2,200 a month. If I can purchase a home of equivalent location, dimensions and quality for the same monthly cost, you say that the monthly outlay of the home is at rental parity.
There are many complex heuristics out there that calculate monthly cost including appreciation, inflation, depreciation, tax implications, etc, but that's the basic idea.
Many investors, or even potential home buyers look at rental parity as an indicator of whether it's a good time to purchase a home because unlike "mortgage payments", market rental rates are primarily determined by three inputs; supply, demand, and the median salary in the area. You can't take out a stinky, festering, sub prime loan to rent an apartment.
NoSoup4U said:Is rental parity usually calculated assuming a 20% down payment?