sleepy5136
Well-known member
Someone can correct me if I'm wrong but the state of CA is requiring solar panels on all new homes. So it's not a builder or greed thing. I think this was in effect starting this year or last year.bluebig said:I concur with Prototype and CalBear.
CalPac seems a bit greedy relative to its peers in how they are going about selling these homes, in my humble opinion. Plus they don't offer co-ops, require home owners to lease or buy solar panel for the roof (not against this as we need more GREEN) but still they are doing this as they are getting a nice tax credit for their development, appear to be selling products that are not even complete (model homes; ie. think about buying a new car with the showcase room car being incomplete). It seems they are trying to jam it in and I'm concerned about their product quality especially as they seem to be using whatever inventory of supplies they have to fit into the homes v allowing homeowners to pick. Just seems odd, I get it we are in the environ we are in but still. Bluff and Highland in that area actually seem more appealing to me as I digest the situation at hand. IP seems to do things in a more elegant fair business like way.
Also as others pointed out seems like there are investment property purchases going on with Lapis. My experience with that has been a high churn of tenants every one to two years, especially in a city like Irvine where there are an abundant number of option albeit current dislocation.
I feel like all builders are greedy besides Shea homes TBH. Lennar Amara (SFH) pricing went from 1m in January 2021 to now 1.4-1.6m.