irvinehomeowner
Well-known member
So I've got some kPolls going:
Stonegate Pricing:http://www.talkirvine.com/index.php?topic=1481.0
Laguna Altura Pricing:http://www.talkirvine.com/index.php?topic=1482.0
But I actually want to discuss The Irvine Company's pricing strategies because I think they are very calculated. They seemed to have divided their model into 3 parts:
1. Low end attached products starting in the $300ks
2. Mid level detached condos starting at $500k going to low $700k
3. High level detached SFRs starting at high $700k and going into the $1m+ range.
Why not make detached SFRs in the mid $600k range? Or detached condos starting at $400k?
As much as it is about profit, I do think it's more about keeping price retention from the 2010 Collection considering they started their SFR pricing in the low $700ks over a year ago. If these homes are more money, then people who bought last year won't feel like they bought too soon. In addition, resale homes in Irvine can remain a healthy market because you can get "more" for the same or less than new homes. I honestly do think that TIC strategically prices their homes as not to erode prior projects and the overall market in Irvine.
Maybe it's just my own psychology, but if I'm looking for a 3CWG/living room/big lot/long driveway/[insert wish feature here] in Irvine, and none of the new homes have it, will I pay similar benchmark prices for a resale home that does? I do think that's one of the reasons why Irvine prices have been more stubborn than surrounding cities... they have multiple new home neighborhoods that keep pricing benchmarks high.
Stonegate Pricing:http://www.talkirvine.com/index.php?topic=1481.0
Laguna Altura Pricing:http://www.talkirvine.com/index.php?topic=1482.0
But I actually want to discuss The Irvine Company's pricing strategies because I think they are very calculated. They seemed to have divided their model into 3 parts:
1. Low end attached products starting in the $300ks
2. Mid level detached condos starting at $500k going to low $700k
3. High level detached SFRs starting at high $700k and going into the $1m+ range.
Why not make detached SFRs in the mid $600k range? Or detached condos starting at $400k?
As much as it is about profit, I do think it's more about keeping price retention from the 2010 Collection considering they started their SFR pricing in the low $700ks over a year ago. If these homes are more money, then people who bought last year won't feel like they bought too soon. In addition, resale homes in Irvine can remain a healthy market because you can get "more" for the same or less than new homes. I honestly do think that TIC strategically prices their homes as not to erode prior projects and the overall market in Irvine.
Maybe it's just my own psychology, but if I'm looking for a 3CWG/living room/big lot/long driveway/[insert wish feature here] in Irvine, and none of the new homes have it, will I pay similar benchmark prices for a resale home that does? I do think that's one of the reasons why Irvine prices have been more stubborn than surrounding cities... they have multiple new home neighborhoods that keep pricing benchmarks high.