Spring Sales Set To Bloom, Says NAR

NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program

IIIrvine_IHB

New member
Is she BSing me? Or am I just not able to be objective about the market?





http://homeseekers.com/scripts/seekers_frame_template.asp?_lid=0&_ver=5&source=http://www.realtytimes.com/customnews/HSrealigent.htm











Spring Sales Set To Bloom, Says NAR




By Blanche Evans




February 8, 2007






<p>While all the numbers aren't in yet, local Realtors are reporting that their winter inventory overhang is selling. Buyers are starting to respond to continuing low interest rates, falling prices and smorgasbord inventories in buyer's markets across the country. Could these robins be heralding a spring comeback in housing? </p>

<p>Existing homes should fare well, but new homes will lag, says National Association of Realtors Chief Economist, David Lereah. </p>

<p>"After reaching what appears to be the bottom in the fourth quarter of 2006, we expect existing-home sales to gradually rise all this year and well into 2008," he said. "New-home sales should continue to slide, but we look for that sector to turn around later in the year. When you put it all together, home sales may appear weak in comparison with the record surge in 2005, but they will be sustained at historically high levels that are in line with long-term demand." </p>

<p>Recently, the NAR announced that existing-home sales reached the third highest total on record, 6.48 million homes sold in 2006, and forecasts sales to soften only slightly to 6.44 million in 2007, with sales improving to 6.68 in 2008. New-home sales, following a fourth-best 1.06 million in 2006, are projected to decline below a million to 961,000 this year and then rise to 971,000 in 2008. Housing starts are likely to total 1.52 million in 2007, down from 1.80 million units in 2006, and then increase to 1.56 million next year, says NAR. </p>

<p>Existing home sellers can move with the markets faster than builders. They can lower prices and add improvements, whereas builders don't tend to provide incentives until inventory is hanging around. "When new home demand begins to catch up with supply, builders will slowly increase construction -- probably in the second half of this year," Lereah predicts. </p>

<p>NAR believes that mortgage interest rates will rise this year, but well below the original forecasts for 2006 at 7 percent. The 30-year fixed-rate mortgage is forecast to rise to 6.7 percent by the second half of the year. </p>

<p>"Mortgage interest rates remain favorable, and a gradual rise means potential buyers have some time to weigh purchase decisions," Lereah said. "When existing-home supplies become more balanced between buyers and sellers this spring, we'll see some modest price gains." </p>

<p>NAR expects prices to grow 1.9 percent to $226,200 in 2007, after rising only 1.1 percent in 2006. That could be the second year that home prices fail to meet and/or beat inflation since 1968 when the NAR first began keeping track. Inflation, as measured by the Consumer Price Index, is projected at 2.0 percent this year, down from 3.2 percent in 2006, while growth in the U.S. gross domestic product is likely to be 2.8 percent in 2007, down from 3.4 percent last year. </p>

<p>One of the benefits of owning a home is its hedge against inflation, but keep in mind, these are national averages. Individual metros may be faring better or worse, due to local economies and other reasons.


</p>



Copyright © 2007 Realty Times. All Rights Reserved.
 
The National Association of Realtors will call the bottom every quarter for the next 20 quarters until we actually do hit bottom. Their credibility can't go any lower, so why not? Eventually they will be right; even a broken clock is right twice a day.





Interesting that the NAR is predicting resales will do better than new housing. Since they don't get paid commissions on new houses (the builders have their own sales people), it is in their best interest to predict strong sales in the resale market. The fact is that the builders will lead the market lower. They will reduce their land basis and build at lower price points to generate sales. The evidence of this practice is all over this board. They will obliterate the resale market in the process, but that isn't their problem. The builders must build and sell. The destruction of the resale market is just an unpleasant consequence.





Statements from the NAR provide those people who want to believe something to cling to.
 
<p>That article is comedy if you ask me. Inflation for the year was 2.6% not 3.2%, I don't even know where they got that number. We have a lot of economic data coming out this week starting with retail sales 2/14, philly fed index 2/15, CPI, PPI, housing starts and permits 2/16. With all that I think we should check back Friday evening to see how the above report faired.</p>

<p>Irvinerenter - I know it seems I agree with you a lot but I agree again. The builders will unload inventory regardless of price. </p>
 
IrvineRenter - it seems that many people assume that the builders will keep on building because they have SO MUCH profit margin. But if I shop around in Irvine now, I see many builders slow down construction or even stop completely until the lots are sold.





While it is true that the builders seems ahead in cutting price right now because they have inventory issue last year, I am not so sure about the future. The builders seem to manage inventory a lot better this time around, and arent' willing to just keep on building at frantic pace and keep lower the price down (to $150 per sqft?) until everything is sold.
 
red:





Sometimes, dependent on the loan structure of course, loan covenants may require HBs to certain presales and/ or lots sold by a certain date. While they may be able to slow down production, HBs don't have forever to stop production entirely. If the "soft landing" scenarion takes longer to work through the market, HBs may just have to go back to building and ultimately, cut prices. Homesellers may think they hold the cards when it comes to setting the prices, but really, they don't.
 
What's more, resales will also be in competition with a deluge of foreclosure and distressed sales from the fall out of exotic financing. One distressed sale in the neighborhood we can chalk it up as such. Multiple distressed sales can set the "comps". The houses in Irvine are very expensive and I am not surprised if homebuyers have been taking out create financing to qualify for the loans. Irvine has enjoyed good employment thus far, but will it continue with New Century's outlook? Irvine is home to many subprime and prime lenders, and we may see some trimming down in the very near future.





This article from Reuters:


<p>"The United States has yet to feel the full brunt of rates being set higher on adjustable-rate mortgages that were taken out in recent years, when underwriting standards slipped, Barron's said.</p>

<p> Defaults should spiral higher as monthly payments increase as rates climb, the report said. New Century, the No. 2 U.S. subprime mortgage lender, relies on outside funding to finance its mortgage pools before they are sold. That financing depends on confidence, which recent events may have shaken, the financial publication said."</p>

http://yahoo.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?storyID=urn:newsml:reuters.com:20070211:MTFH01572_2007-02-11_19-29-16_N11309611&type=comktNews&rpc=44





<p> </p>

<p>


</p>
 
red,





Last year, I left a major homebuilder to work for a local land developer. I see the real estate market from both sides of wholesale buying and selling. The builders do have huge profit margins right now which are almost 3 times their historic average. They do have plenty of room to lower prices even with their current land cost structure. Also, they have been taking huge write downs in their land basis to give them even more room to lower prices in the future if they need to. Keep in mind that land price is by far the largest cost component of house prices in Irvine. The major builders are building and selling the exact same houses in Riverside County for half the price. The only difference between Irvine and Banning is the land price. The cost to the homebuilders to construct the "box" is the same. The homebuilders will adjust their pricing to generate sales. If they don't build and sell, they die.





The real challenge for builders right now is adjusting prices in a downtrending market without being sued by recent home buyers. You are going to see the builders make their phases smaller so they sell out quicker and they can adjust their prices lower after each phase. Also, you are going to see many new floorplans as the builders try to disguise the lowering of prices from phase to phase. The sales prices on a per-square-foot basis will drop, but since the floorplans will be different, it will be difficult for homeowners who paid to much to sue the builders to get the price reductions back. You will also see the builders start each new phase with zero incentives, and as they get closer to completion and prices are declining, they will load up the incentives again to close out the phase. This process will continue until the market finds its new equilibrium.
 
<p>IrvineRenter,</p> <p>I agree with much of your analysis, except for the part about builders being sued by recent purchasers (presumably upset about buying on the way down). I have yet to hear someone describe what such a suit would look like. What would the cause of action be?</p> <p>I saw the article in the OC Register about the folks in Garden Grove -- but again, I don't see how they will prevail (their complaint should be dismissed).</p> <p>My conclusion is that fear of being sued will not be an impediment to price adjustments by builders.</p>
 
<p>IrvineRenter, </p>

<p> Nice info there. I wonder how the new housing market will contend with the resale homes.</p>

<p>Thanks.</p>

<p>-bix</p>
 
<p>skeptic: <em>I saw the article in the OC Register about the folks in Garden Grove -- but again, I don't see how they will prevail (their complaint should be dismissed). My conclusion is that fear of being sued will not be an impediment to price adjustments by builders.</em></p>

<p>You are correct in that the FB's in Garden grove may have little legal basis to sue, but lawsuits, regardless of basis, carry a heavy cost burden for the HBs in general for all the parties involved. If they can do minor floorplan adjustments to avoid some of that exposure, they will do it.</p>
 
Back
Top