Bullsback,
When I first started investing in real estate, I had a misconception that single family homes is where everyone starts and eventually graduates to multi-family, commercial building or large apartment complexes. I was on a mission to find out what is the best asset to buy and hold for my personal retirement portfolio.
I took out several successful commercial brokers and even financial planners out to lunch to ask them what their retirement portfolio looks like. None of the commercial brokers I met owned any commercial properties like office buildings, warehouses, or retail centers etc. Several owned single family homes and multi-family, few owned apartments, and some surprisingly did not own any real estate.
I've talked with several very successful buy and hold investors where their net passive income was close to $200k/year. They owned a combination of single family homes and multi-family. The issue they had with multi-family was that the average tenants only stayed 9 months, and also there were disputes among the tenants about who is responsible for maintenance. Some tenants would even gang up on the landlord and there was a quite of bit of wear and tear in the units every time there was a turn over. These successful buy and hold investors did say that they would not mind exchanging their single family homes for a good 1or 2 large apartment complex in a good area.
A disadvantage of selling an apartment building or commercial property is that the buyer will be another investor. This investor will negotiate to get the best price and terms that he can get. He maybe a better negotiator than you.
Also Investment property can experience large swings in value as the economy changes. An empty office building or commercial building will sell for a small fraction of what it cost to build.
A major advantage of investing in several single family homes rather than one big apartment or office building is that you can diversify by investing in different price ranges. By owning both less expensive ad more expensive houses, you can have the safety of the lower priced houses and the upside potential of the higher priced ones.
Therefore I concluded that I only want to have a combination of single family homes and possibly an apartment building in my retirement portfolio. However, if I never own an apartment building in my life, I am completely okay with that.
If I do own an apartment building in the future, I will have the understanding that this is a business and needs to be treated like a business, not a passive retirement income portfolio like owning a portfolio of 30-40 single family homes located in good solid neighborhoods.
Bullsback said:
Now all tax situations are different, but you won't get any initial benefit on those taxes as an individual. Ultimately in your basis of the property, those losses will be factored in if you eventually sell (or if you have other gains to apply it to) but the mortgage interest deduction doesn't work the same on rental properties (where it is just part of your profit / loss factor along with amortization, etc) than it does on a personal residence.
Somewhere you should factor in actual principal reduction which is paid for by the tenant of course. Cap Rate is clearly a focus if your goal is income production from the property vs. appreciation. My overall understanding was most savy real estate investors focused far more on Cap Rates on commercial and multifamily housing than they did on SFR housing (not saying they didn't analyze cap rates, just that multifamily and commercial tended to be easier to ultimately compare cap rates and thus determine appropriate values / returns). Than again, I don't know how many savvy real estate investors invest in SFR's vs. multifamily units.