Price of a new house in irvine

NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program

snake

New member
Does anybody have an idea how the cost of an average house in irvine is broken down?

Say for example for a 1M$ house

Land=?
House=?
 
400 sq/f?

Isn't that  a very high price? I got a 325$ sq/f for a custom house with 20 caissons and the whole structure in reinforced concrete not just wood on a slab.

 
snake said:
Does anybody have an idea how the cost of an average house in irvine is broken down?

Say for example for a 1M$ house

Land=?
House=?

A typical $1 M new house, the land/site are about $350k and the dwelling are about $650k.  $650k is not the cost of building the home, it's the price builder charges the home buyer.

The cost of the land is very hard to estimate too.  Most builder here in Irvine don't develop the land, they bought the land from the land developer and that land developer usually is The Irvine Company.  The builder might have to pay higher than $350k for a 4000 sq.ft. lot from The Irvine Company to build their million dollar homes.

FYI,  The New Home Company, which build Amelia and Trevi in Orchard Hill, paid The Irvine Company on average of $1.05 million per lot.
 
How many sq/f are we speaking about for the lot and the for the house?

So what they quoted me is:

75k$ grading
300k$ foundation
225$  sq/f for a high quality house (very good plumbing, elec etc.)

house is a bit more than 3000 sq/f

So it comes to 325 to 350$ sq/f

But the quality looks to me much higher than the average house I see built by lennar, kb home taylor morrison or any other "mass production" builder.

The foundation for example needs drilling, caissons etc, all the walls are reinforced concrete.

I am wondering if I am missing something (and I get the little surprise down the road) or simply irvine is  a stand alone case.

What I heard (lennar wisper) is different from what you are telling me.

I ave been told 600k to 650k lot, 250k to 300k house cost, the rest is the markup of the builder (50k to 100k max)
 
Thank you for the links. Very useful.

does this mean that in principle you would have a more stable (less leverage) value if you build an expensive house on a cheap lot?

Say if you manage to get a lot for  250k and you build a house that costs 750k?
 
And from the article the numbers I have been told (land - house- builder mark up)do look like in the ball park.
 
Land development in desirable cities of OC.

Builders construction cost is about $50/sf.

For a 2,000 sf home the construction cost is $100,000

At $400/sf selling price is $800,000. 87% of the selling price $700,000 includes cost of the land, overhead and profit. Builders profit margin is capped at some percentages like 6%-7% and overage goes to land developers.
 
snake said:
Thank you for the links. Very useful.

does this mean that in principle you would have a more stable (less leverage) value if you build an expensive house on a cheap lot?

Say if you manage to get a lot for  250k and you build a house that costs 750k?
Land appreciates. Construction depreciates. So higher land value properties typically appreciate better long term although they may be more volatile in boom/bust cycles.
 
Back
Top