balboarenter_IHB
New member
I'm surprised there hasn't been any discussion of this. If there has, I apologize for double posting.
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, Calif. ? It used to be so final: flush the toilet, and waste be gone.
But on Nov. 30, for millions of people here in Orange County, pulling the lever will be the start of a long, intense process to purify the sewage into drinking water ? after a hard scrubbing with filters, screens, chemicals and ultraviolet light and the passage of time underground.
...
The finished product, which district managers say exceeds drinking water standards, will not flow directly into kitchen and bathroom taps; state regulations forbid that.
Instead it will be injected underground, with half of it helping to form a barrier against seawater intruding on groundwater sources and the other half gradually filtering into aquifers that supply 2.3 million people, about three-quarters of the county. The recycling project will produce much more potable water and at a higher quality than did the mid-1970s-era plant it replaces.
Full article: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/27/us/27conserve.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
I actually read the water quality pamphlets I get from the city, and I've never had a problem with drinking tap water. But there is just something within me that cringes at the thought of this process.
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, Calif. ? It used to be so final: flush the toilet, and waste be gone.
But on Nov. 30, for millions of people here in Orange County, pulling the lever will be the start of a long, intense process to purify the sewage into drinking water ? after a hard scrubbing with filters, screens, chemicals and ultraviolet light and the passage of time underground.
...
The finished product, which district managers say exceeds drinking water standards, will not flow directly into kitchen and bathroom taps; state regulations forbid that.
Instead it will be injected underground, with half of it helping to form a barrier against seawater intruding on groundwater sources and the other half gradually filtering into aquifers that supply 2.3 million people, about three-quarters of the county. The recycling project will produce much more potable water and at a higher quality than did the mid-1970s-era plant it replaces.
Full article: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/27/us/27conserve.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
I actually read the water quality pamphlets I get from the city, and I've never had a problem with drinking tap water. But there is just something within me that cringes at the thought of this process.