trip said:
I have someone who may be interested in that area, if I send him to you do I get a cut? j/k. I don't need a cut. My question is can you be a fair agent when representing both buyer and seller? I've heard some people said not to trust seller agent to represent the buyer, and other people said that is fine to work with dual agent as long as the buyer knows what he's doing.
I would recommend to
always work with someone you trust, whether that be the listing broker or your own "buyer's broker."
To answer your question, I recognize that there is a perceived conflict of interest in representing both buyer and seller. What many fail to additionally weigh in are the other interests that are involved, including those of the brokerage and also of the individual agent. Often times these interests are at odds.
To frame it in a different perspective, would you go to a doctor to get well? Does that doctor have
only your best interests in mind? What about his obligations to the
hospital, to his own
health, to his own
pocketbook, to the doctor's
business partnership? Some argue (correctly) that you can't be a slave to two different masters, but I also would add (just as correctly, I think) that no man has only one master.
In regards to real estate transactions, my experience has been in representing both parties only about 10% of the time. Up front, I ask the sellers to please don't tell me what their bottom line number is, and likewise I ask to please don't let me know what a buyer's max is. And then just present the offers, as in "Here is the buyer's offer. Would you like to accept, counter or decline. The advantages/disadvantages of each option are X, Y, And Z."
If they get together, great. If they are very nearly together and it is within my power and inclination to bridge the gap, I am happy to do that. If they are too far apart, then no deal gets done. Everyone is made clear. Everything is transparent, and in writing. No surprises.
-IrvineRealtor