More girls born in Irvine than boys?

NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program

dysr

New member
A Montessori teacher in Irvine told me that their school is seriously girl-heavy and girls need to wait in a much longer queue to get enrolled than boys. Is't true that there are much more girls born in Irvine than boys?
 
I think it has to do with the chemicals in the water and the hormones in the chickens that expectant mothers consume.
 
dysr said:
qwerty said:
Yes. The girls born in china are sent to irvine so they aren't killed

What a stupid answer.

you take one comment from one teach at one school and try to extrapolate to the entire city  - that sounds more like a stupid question. for all we know my answer may be correct  :)
 
qwerty said:
you take one comment from one teach at one school and try to extrapolate to the entire city  - that sounds more like a stupid question. for all we know my answer may be correct  :)

I am raising question, not drawing a conclusion. Besides, I am asking kids born in Irvine. Open your eyes before opening your mouth, or you can only give stupid answer.
 
qwerty said:
Dysr - I have a certain set of skills that make me a nightmare for people like you. If you delete my post one more time, I will find you and I will .....

Uh-oh. I have a feeling this ends in finding Dysr dead behind the southern blimp hangar in Tustin next to the body of a Chinese man who dared to ask how much per pound for your tasty-looking pooch.
 
irvinehomeowner said:
@qwerter:

Only you or dysr can delete the posts (and zovall).

So take your guess.

He said my question is wasting his time, so I think perhaps I should help him save some time...  :D
It's an interesting feature.
 
qwerty said:
Dysr - I have a certain set of skills that make me a nightmare for people like you. If you delete my post one more time, I will find you and I will .....

Go ahead and finish your words, before I delete your every single post in this thread.
 
I really hate the ability for thread starter to delete posts.  Zovall, please please please change this policy.  Dysr, don't be so sensitive.  It's not vitriol thrown at you, it's just a couple of members (some longstanding) having a little fun, no harm intended (at least I think).

Did I mention I hate posts that are deleted, unless they're mean personal attacks.  Those should be deleted.  Qwerty's posts weren't meant to be mean spirited.
 
OCgasman said:
I really hate the ability for thread starter to delete posts.  Zovall, please please please change this policy.  Dysr, don't be so sensitive.  It's not vitriol thrown at you, it's just a couple of members (some longstanding) having a little fun, no harm intended (at least I think).

Did I mention I hate posts that are deleted, unless they're mean personal attacks.  Those should be deleted.  Qwerty's posts weren't meant to be mean spirited.

Sorry for upsetting you. I may be wrong sensing hostility from Qwerty's posts -- English is a foreign language to me. In my eyes Qwerty's post is more serious than personal attacks. It is a life threat (federal felony?):
qwerty said:
Dysr - I have a certain set of skills that make me a nightmare for people like you. If you delete my post one more time, I will find you and I will .....


 
Tyler Durden said:
This is a self fulfilling feature... you delete posts that others spend the time to create, everyone will take notice and in the future you will be ignored.  Basically you are wasting everyone's time by trying to dictate what answers you would like to receive to a question that you asked and censoring out the ones you didn't like.  No one here is getting paid to answer questions... so you have to be willing to sort through the wheat to get to the chaff.

If you appeal to the public for help, you have to take the good with the bad...

You are definitely right. I am a new comer of this forum. I've thought you guys know and acknowledge the rules (that a thread starter can delete posts) better than I do.

When 23andme affirmed that I am a warrior by gene, I didn't believe it. Now we see gene is powerful.http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/01/090121093343.htm
 
Back
Top