eyephone said:The freeway is a disaster in Corona. The weather is hella hot. The schools are call it what you want. Crime is a big problem over there. (I can go on, but it won't be pc)zubs said:
acpme said:I looked at office-using employment growth (i.e. gains in white collar employment) for ATL since 1990. It grew at an annual rate of 2.5% which is impressive. National avg is 1.7%. Consider a market like Dallas has grown at 3% and a laggard like Chicago 0.9%. So ATL was better than I expected.
However, to say that Johns Creek is 15 yrs behind Irvine is bold. JC's population is at the level of Irvine's in the mid-80s. So if JC grew like Irvine, which was one of the great American growth stories of this generation, it'd take 25-30 years. For JC's 80K population to grow to Irvine's 250K in 15 years, it would have to 8% growth a year. I'm not sure there's anything in the world that will grow 8% annually over the next 15 years - maybe my grey hairs.
The inherent problem though with a market like ATL, which has been mentioned earlier, is how much of a sprawl the metro is with very few infill areas outside of Downtown and Buckhead. Attached is the areas of job density in metro ATL and OC. The story of Irvine was relatively easy to see just based on geography. It's at the confluence of major freeways and centrally located. You could see how households would form there because even if Irvine didn't become a major employment hub, it allowed easy access to the other employment centers to the north, south, and west.
On the other hand in ATL, there's so many separated employment areas. It's great if you can both live and work in a small affluent town like Johns Creek, but the opportunities will be more sparse. If you're not self-employed and your company decides to move to a more dense urban area to be closer to talent pools (common theme across US cities), there goes your lifestyle. Commute to Alpharetta, ok you'll manage. Sandy Springs, annoying but doable. Buckhead, ugh. Downtown, yikes! For a lot of families, given there's still plenty of more nice, affordable, more infill suburbs, you'd probably just move. And that is inherently what makes growth for any particular neighborhood in a market like ATL hard to predict, compared to more densified areas such as OC.
momopi said:...$210K home purchased in 2016 renting for $1700 is better cash flow than Chino in down cycle, where 3 bed SFR's built in the last decade sold for $280K-$300K in 2008-2009 and rents for $1800-$1850 today.
acpme said:I looked at office-using employment growth (i.e. gains in white collar employment) for ATL since 1990. It grew at an annual rate of 2.5% which is impressive. National avg is 1.7%. Consider a market like Dallas has grown at 3% and a laggard like Chicago 0.9%. So ATL was better than I expected.
However, to say that Johns Creek is 15 yrs behind Irvine is bold. JC's population is at the level of Irvine's in the mid-80s. So if JC grew like Irvine, which was one of the great American growth stories of this generation, it'd take 25-30 years. For JC's 80K population to grow to Irvine's 250K in 15 years, it would have to 8% growth a year. I'm not sure there's anything in the world that will grow 8% annually over the next 15 years - maybe my grey hairs.
The inherent problem though with a market like ATL, which has been mentioned earlier, is how much of a sprawl the metro is with very few infill areas outside of Downtown and Buckhead. Attached is the areas of job density in metro ATL and OC. The story of Irvine was relatively easy to see just based on geography. It's at the confluence of major freeways and centrally located. You could see how households would form there because even if Irvine didn't become a major employment hub, it allowed easy access to the other employment centers to the north, south, and west.
On the other hand in ATL, there's so many separated employment areas. It's great if you can both live and work in a small affluent town like Johns Creek, but the opportunities will be more sparse. If you're not self-employed and your company decides to move to a more dense urban area to be closer to talent pools (common theme across US cities), there goes your lifestyle. Commute to Alpharetta, ok you'll manage. Sandy Springs, annoying but doable. Buckhead, ugh. Downtown, yikes! For a lot of families, given there's still plenty of more nice, affordable, more infill suburbs, you'd probably just move. And that is inherently what makes growth for any particular neighborhood in a market like ATL hard to predict, compared to more densified areas such as OC.
irvineshadow said:Panda's post make me want to pack up and move to Georgia, if nothing else.
irvineshadow said:Panda's post make me want to pack up and move to Georgia, if nothing else.
Perspective said:irvineshadow said:Panda's post make me want to pack up and move to Georgia, if nothing else.
Sort of like how "Fixer Upper" on HGTV fools you into believing Waco TX might be a nice place to live.