Foreclosure Radar Data

NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program

25inIrvine_IHB

New member
My goal is to update this at the end of every month if there is enough interest.



The two things I'm mainly watching for are:



1. How many P's are becoming A's and A's becoming B's, etc.

2. How much as whole is activity growing or shrinking? And if so, in what cities?

3. Right now this shows that preforeclosures account for just over 50% of the data. Will this change over time and by how much?



Some disclaimers: This does not include all cities in Orange County. In order to keep the amount of time spent updating reasonable, I chose to omit some cities. For some of the larger cities, I included some zip codes to break it down a little more. Of course, I included all of Irvine's zips. The zip codes are not included in the totals at the bottom. Also, this data is of the number of NODs, NOTs, and REOs, not to be confused with total dollar estimates.



<img src="http://i28.tinypic.com/fckv20.jpg" alt="" />









I also attached the PDF. Hopefully someone can host it somewhere in the future so I do not have to submit in this format.



If someone knows an easy way to copy and paste it here and make it line up, let me know.
 
With only about 10% of these actually bank owned and a bit over 50% in pre-foreclosure it seems pretty obvious that there's a lot of homes coming down the pike in the next year.
 
not all P's will become A's and not all A's will become B's... it'll be interesting to see if the percentages of homes in various stages of foreclosure increase or decrease...
 
25inIrvine - you can use table tags as given below



<A href="http://www.w3schools.com/html/html_tables.asp">http://www.w3schools.com/html/html_tables.asp</A>



Test below



<table>

<tr>

<td>City 1</td>

<td>Number 1</td>

</tr>

<tr>

<td>City2</td>

<td>Number 2</td>

</tr>

</table>



Hmm, ok never mind, doesn't work.
 
Updated the list over the weekend. % Change is month over month. Looks like more are moving into the 2nd stage of foreclosure.



<img src="http://i26.tinypic.com/2yo98w7.jpg" alt="" />







The ones with asterisks are because I learned that it gives more accurate results by zip code. So if its a city that has only one zip code, I will do the search by zip code from now on (except for Foothill Ranch, some reason city name is better there). For example, CDM really didn't increase by that much but I did it by the city last month and the zip code this time. The asterisks will remind me to do by zip code from now on. I did change Aliso Viejo and Ladera Ranch on 8/18 so those updates are accurate, but only 2 weeks worth of change.
<fieldset class="gc-fieldset">
<legend> Attached files </legend> <a href="http://www.talkirvine.com/converted_files/images/forum_attachments/420_tSrpY16tChpEP9IH5dMT.pdf" target="_blank" class="gc-files">ForeclosureRadar Data August.pdf</a> <span class="gc-filesize">(31 B)</span> </fieldset>
 
NTS's still growing at a faster rate then those that are leaving NOD stage.



I'm thinking of adding the ones that go to a 3rd Party to the list. Since now 19% of those at auction are going to a 3rd party and I do believe a good chunk will soon be back on the market as the pros try to make a profit. Do those stay on Foreclosure Radar for 120 days just like the bank owned?



Keep in mind that the Bank Owned ones come off Foreclosure Radar after 120 days. So that 7.96% in drop for B's does not mean they have sold or have not sold but just mean it has been 120 days since they went back to the bank.



edit : I took out some cities to save some time vs. the time I will be adding to put in the 3rd party column. I think the cities I took out were Newport Coast, CDM, Laguna Beach, Yorba Linda, Fountain Valley, and La Habra.



<img src="http://i37.tinypic.com/16a4bpf.jpg" alt="" />
<fieldset class="gc-fieldset">
<legend> Attached files </legend> <a href="http://www.talkirvine.com/converted_files/images/forum_attachments/447_w8aimLjQCEUiNjTzF4dX.pdf" target="_blank" class="gc-files">ForeclosureRadar Data.pdf</a> <span class="gc-filesize">(59 B)</span> </fieldset>
 
[quote author="25inIrvine" date=1254792486]I'm thinking of adding the ones that go to a 3rd Party to the list. They now 19% of those at auction are going to a 3rd party and I do believe a good chunk will soon be back on the market as the pros try to make a profit. Do those stay on Foreclosure Radar for 120 days just like the bank owned?</blockquote>


Yes, they will be on there for 120 days too.
 
I attached 3rd Party just so I have a starting point for future reference.
<fieldset class="gc-fieldset">
<legend> Attached files </legend> <a href="http://www.talkirvine.com/converted_files/images/forum_attachments/448_nWPSkDbybWXrzjdbBnZa.pdf" target="_blank" class="gc-files">ForeclosureRadar Data.pdf</a> <span class="gc-filesize">(49 B)</span> </fieldset>
 
Back
Top