My side is that huge fees and commissions have been taken out of what should be a zero sum equation. The CDSs are carried on balance sheets as values which have no basis in reality. They are completely unregulated, therefore there is no reason to think the losing side of a default will be able to make good. The OTC derivative market is all based on debt and leverage. No one knows who holds what, how much, and whether the losing parties are solvent or will be solvent if they try to make good.<p>
CDSs are without regulation, without listing on public exchanges, without standards, therefore not in the least bit transparent, and therefore without an open market of the bid/ask type. CDSs are dealt in by private treaty negotiations and without a clearinghouse. They are unfunded without financial guarantee of any kind, functioning as contracts of specific performance. The financial character or ability to perform is totally dependent on the balance sheet of the loser in the arrangement. CDSs are evaluated by computer assumptions made by geek, non market experienced mathematicians who assume religiously that all markets return to their normal relationships regardless of disruptions.
Now in the credit and default category alone considered by accepted authorities as totaling more than USD$20 trillion in notional value. Notional value becomes real value when the agreement is forced to find a real market for ending the obligation which is how one says sell it.<p>
rickhunter - I am confused. If you knew what CDSs are, why did you ask me as if you did not know? Why did you not just ask me why I considered them important? Why the smokescreen?