irvinehomeshopper said:Woodbridge legally is required to disclose the Plume but the wordings does not explicitly say you can't eat what you grow. Tustin Legacy unfortunately consulted with liability conscientious attorneys and came up with a word clause that became the single point of failure for the development.
frank69m said:irvinehomeshopper said:Woodbridge legally is required to disclose the Plume but the wordings does not explicitly say you can't eat what you grow. Tustin Legacy unfortunately consulted with liability conscientious attorneys and came up with a word clause that became the single point of failure for the development.
You mean this what I had posted before:
test said:frank69m said:irvinehomeshopper said:Woodbridge legally is required to disclose the Plume but the wordings does not explicitly say you can't eat what you grow. Tustin Legacy unfortunately consulted with liability conscientious attorneys and came up with a word clause that became the single point of failure for the development.
You mean this what I had posted before:
You mean the image you stole from this thread?
http://www.irvinehousingblog.com/forums/viewthread/6039/
frank69m said:test said:frank69m said:irvinehomeshopper said:Woodbridge legally is required to disclose the Plume but the wordings does not explicitly say you can't eat what you grow. Tustin Legacy unfortunately consulted with liability conscientious attorneys and came up with a word clause that became the single point of failure for the development.
You mean this what I had posted before:
You mean the image you stole from this thread?
http://www.irvinehousingblog.com/forums/viewthread/6039/
First off mr. tester or testor, I never claimed to have scanned that picture. If you read my post, I said something I had posted previously. If you look at previous postings in this forum I had posted that before. Why don't I talk about all the pictures you stole from the irvine company web site. I see many of your postings having taken pictures from that site.
irvinehomeshopper said:Guys, fighting for credit is just petty. You both brought this excerpt to light and I appreciate the time you both spent in posting it.
irvinehomeshopper said:Then Tustin Legacy should just keep this one and lift the Don't eat fruits clause.
irvinehomeshopper said:Once a bad thing is let out it is really hard to retract.
test said:irvinehomeshopper said:Once a bad thing is let out it is really hard to retract.
The clause you are referring to never existed and hence never let out. The only thing out is liberal media lies.
MovingOnUp said:test said:irvinehomeshopper said:Once a bad thing is let out it is really hard to retract.
The clause you are referring to never existed and hence never let out. The only thing out is liberal media lies.
If you really want anyone not living there to believe you, please plant some fruit trees in your backyard and attach a video of you and your family eating from it. Then I might just believe you...probably not.
On a serious note, do NOT worry. Asian FCB's can't read english and their asian realtor is greedy as hell. The realtor would never disclose that info to the buyer in their native tongue if it meant risking the commission.
irvinehomeshopper said:C'mon. That clause was posted and many have read it.