Cry me a river. . ..

NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
<p>This article seriously ticks me off. . .</p>

<p><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/managing/content/nov2007/ca2007111_215109.htm?campaign_id=yhoo">www.businessweek.com/managing/content/nov2007/ca2007111_215109.htm</a></p>

<p>"All the talk in Washington and New York these days is about the subprime mortgage collapse and the writedowns at financial institutions like Merrill Lynch (<a rel="ticker" href="http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/snapshot/snapshot.asp?symbol=MER">MER</a>) and Citigroup (<a rel="ticker" href="http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/snapshot/snapshot.asp?symbol=C">C</a>). Isn't anyone concerned about homeowners these days? More than one million Americans will lose their homes this year because they cannot keep up with their mortgage payments. So far only Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson seems worried about the homeowners who are being tossed out on the street. </p>

<p>I raised this issue in front of several thousand real estate developers on Oct. 26 in the course of presenting my book, <cite>True North</cite>. While most of the real estate folks were sympathetic to the plight of homeowners, the head of a large real estate investment trust was first up in the Q&A session. He described people who are losing their homes as "nothing but a bunch of speculators who falsified their mortgage applications." </p>

<p><strong>Not exactly, sir. These homeowners are common folks who got talked (might I say conned?) into home purchases with no-down-payment mortgages that offered low rates in the early years until they were adjusted upward. Those people are being forced out of their homes because they can't make the increased payments, and the value of their homes has sunk well below the amount remaining on their mortgages. </strong></p>

<p><strong>Mortgage brokers like Countrywide Financial (</strong><a rel="ticker" href="http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/snapshot/snapshot.asp?symbol=CFC"><strong>CFC</strong></a><strong>), the nation's largest mortgage broker, have been aggressively pushing these offerings</strong>. They have been permitted to operate outside the complex regulatory system that governs our banks and the traditional mortgage companies. Now homeowners are paying a big price for the Bush Administration's lack of regulations to protect consumers...."</p>

<p>No where in this article is personal accountability mentioned. Where is "homeowners' are adults and are responsible for their own actions"? Where is "these people who took out the exotic loans knew full well that they could not afford their homes but bought them anyways"? </p>

<p>This is not a situation where companies put dangerous products out in the market and the consumer could not have known of the danger. No consumer protection is needed. People got greedy and now they are getting burned. This is no different that people buying stocks on margin. </p>

<p>This article reminds of my favorite product warning that was found on a stick of lip balm: "Do not use in or around eyes"</p>
 
I do agree that homeowners are adults - need to be responsible for thier actions - and I am against a bailout. However, I do believe there are many good, regular people out there that really did try to make responsible, smart decisions and are going to end up really hurt by this situation. People who don't know how to access information through the computer or other sources - the internet is not easy for everyone. I think the media deserves a lot more blame than they are getting - where were the articles presenting the 'other side' of the story - were the analysists who knew this was going to happen getting equal air time on the regular news - of course not!
 
<p>A lot were cons, a lot were stupids, but some were doing their best. Any aid offered is likely, however, to end up with the cons, not the doing their bests.</p>

<p>It takes real guts to go against the stream.</p>
 
There were some crazy people out there. Amongst my friends:





1) Has deposits against 50 condominium units in Vancouver. She is planning to flip them to speculators.


2) Has 45 houses in Vegas in the same subdivision bought new from Pulte. He is currently renting them out at negative cash flow.


3) Has deposits against 2 condos hotel units north of C$1,000,000 and title to 2 condo units and 1 condo hotel unit at an average purchase price of C$800,000 in Vancouver. He said he plans to sell them before the Olympics.


4) Bought a condominium in Miami Beach for $1,000,000 that is 1000 square feet with 1 parking space and no guest parking


5) Owns a C$1.3M house in West Van and a C$700,000 house in East Van. The first was bought all cash in 2006. She is considering buying another house at C$2.1M by financing her two houses she holds free and clear because she is worried if she waits she will be priced out. She actually told me that real estate always goes up in value.


6) Is facing foreclosure on a house he paid $1.8M for in San Diego (La Jolla) his car (Lamborghini) is being repoed.



 
A mil in Miami Beach, huh?



Gonna lose a bunch of money right there. Sorry, has already lost a lot of

money. I can't believe some people haven't come to their senses yet.
 
<p>There are some sane people out there. Amongst my friends:</p>

<p>Rents a $1M house in Coto for a quarter of what his mortgage payment would be if he owned (you know who you are).</p>

<p>Sold at the height of the market in Long Beach, now renting in same building for half the cost.</p>

<p>Rents and socks away money diligently waiting for house prices to either bottom or hit his rent vs buy equation.</p>

<p>------------------</p>

<p>Bishie, what are you ? A oil tycoon or something ? </p>

<p> </p>

<p> </p>
 
Back
Top