<p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal">Although we can pretty much afford a nice 'starter' condo in south OC even at its prime pricing, my SO and I have decided that there was no way we were able to live in an attached housing for more than a couple years. In addition, I don’t want to move just because I accidentally (or purposely) have kids! For these reasons, we are saving up and holding off for a brand new not-so-starter and arguably bit over-priced home in Irvine.
If I buy the place I've set my eyes on right now in Portola Springs, I would have no problem living there for the next 15-20 years. Of course, I admit it is easier said than done but if you could work and sacrifice a bit more now to have a nicer place in a few years, why not do so?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal">Everyone’s situation is different and I’m sure there are those who would better benefit from a cheaper starter home (cost, not quality). Since I am able to still save money each month now and can deal with my current non-permanent housing for another few years, I’d rather just save up for a bigger place rather than settle for something I know won’t do in 5-7 years.
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;" class="MsoNormal">But like I said and as <a href="../../../account/133/">mk9</a> stated, sometimes people just can't afford a larger place and have to settle for a smaller starter home. There is absolutely nothing wrong with it. In the long run, the fees you pay from buying/selling shouldn't make too much a dent in your wallet.
</p>