thelandofnoland
New member
-ARCHIVED-
26
- Thread starter thelandofnoland
- Start date
NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
San Francisco can be foggy and cold but there are plenty of areas near SF that is really nice and more temperate. Traffic is not even close to being as bad as OC/LA. Not to mention, they have a usable public transit alternative in BART.
For me, the choices would be:
1) SF/Bay Area
2) OC/LA
3) Portland
4) Las Vegas
5) Chicago
I loved Chicago when I visited but the weather is a killer. Portland is great but the schools are not so good. Vegas can be extremely hot but has a good Asian community and pretty low RE prices.
No. 0 on my list.
NYC is a terrible place to live IMO...especially with a family. Bad weather, expensive, and crowded. Houses are usually old and/or insanely expensive.
Well...since I'm not a 0.1%...it's a terrible place IMO. Beside, most of the 0.1% live in Long Island or Connecticut.
- Status
irvinehomeowner
Well-known member
Why is Irvine not on this list? 
irvinehomeowner
Well-known member
I really think Orange County (or even San Diego) should be on this poll.
The best weather of any of the cities listed, not as dense as LA but close enough for LA's "nightlife". OC has a great family atmosphere, and while not the best in transportation choices, there is enough to get you to the places you need to go.
And although I don't think qwermacho should be considering any selection of women, Southern Cali can compete with Miami in that department.
The best weather of any of the cities listed, not as dense as LA but close enough for LA's "nightlife". OC has a great family atmosphere, and while not the best in transportation choices, there is enough to get you to the places you need to go.
And although I don't think qwermacho should be considering any selection of women, Southern Cali can compete with Miami in that department.
usctrojancpa
Well-known member
I've been to the SF/Bay Area many, many times and don't see the great appeal of wanting to live there. It's too cold and foggy way too often plus traffic is 10x worse than the traffic in OC.freedomcm said:
irvinehomeowner
Well-known member
Maybe I'm the only one, but even if I were a 1%er, I would still choose to live in Southern Cali... most likely OC.
Irvinecommuter
New member
USCTrojanCPA said:
San Francisco can be foggy and cold but there are plenty of areas near SF that is really nice and more temperate. Traffic is not even close to being as bad as OC/LA. Not to mention, they have a usable public transit alternative in BART.
For me, the choices would be:
1) SF/Bay Area
2) OC/LA
3) Portland
4) Las Vegas
5) Chicago
I loved Chicago when I visited but the weather is a killer. Portland is great but the schools are not so good. Vegas can be extremely hot but has a good Asian community and pretty low RE prices.
The Motor Court Company
Well-known member
where's Atlanta, Georgia on this list?
irvinehomeowner
Well-known member
Heh... Johns Creek more specifically.The California Court Company said:
Irvinecommuter
New member
irvinehomeowner said:
No. 0 on my list.
Just curious, what is this list based on? Weird that Jersey City makes it (not vibrant, btw), but it's more "vibrant" counterpart, Hoboken, doesn't? Also, places like Richmond, Cincinnati, but not any of the Texas cities or the aforementioned Atlanta? Nothing beats Manhattan so I settled for the 2nd best thing... Brooklyn.
Irvinecommuter
New member
bones said:
NYC is a terrible place to live IMO...especially with a family. Bad weather, expensive, and crowded. Houses are usually old and/or insanely expensive.
Irvinecommuter
New member
bones said:
Well...since I'm not a 0.1%...it's a terrible place IMO. Beside, most of the 0.1% live in Long Island or Connecticut.
irvinehomeowner
Well-known member
Why is this thread even in Irvine Real Estate (without having Irvine as a poll option)?
#IrvineElitist
#IrvineElitist
- Status