YellowFever
New member
.
Given your taste in music, I wouldn't get an attached home.YellowFever said:Given the same community/neighborhood (Eastwood), everything else equal, 4 bedroom attached or 3 bedroom detached? Both have California rooms and 2 car garages. The detached is atleast $100k more but attached has $200 more HOA. The attached has nobody on top, just attached on one side.
What would you pick and why?
Common sense says detached appreciates more, but at the same time, extra downstairs bedroom is a plus. However, I've never seen data that proves that given the same specs, after 5 or 10 years, the appreciation curve of the detached begins to widen over the detached considerably.
Not sure why attached homes gets knocked on so much in Irvine, considering almost all the million dollar homes in San Francisco are literally squished and attached.
YellowFever said:Not sure why attached homes gets knocked on so much
YellowFever said:Not sure why attached homes gets knocked on so much in Irvine, considering almost all the million dollar homes in San Francisco are literally squished and attached.
paydawg said:YellowFever said:Not sure why attached homes gets knocked on so much in Irvine, considering almost all the million dollar homes in San Francisco are literally squished and attached.
You can't compare Irvine to SF. That's apples to oranges.
Not true for my attached condo.AW said:Doesn't matter how much insulation or layers of drywall for attached, you'll still hear your neighbor slamming doors and the garage door. So yeah, given the choice, I'd choose detached.